Monthly Archives: January 2010

Iraq in Fragments | documentary 3 of 100

What’s incredible about this Oscar-nominated film is that it appears to have been made almost singlehandedly by a lone white guy, James Longly. He was born in Eugene, Oregon, but apparently hasn’t spent much time there over the past several years. Instead, he’s been living in places like Iraq (where he spent 2 years making this film); Iran (where he was arrested during the election last year), and he’s currently doing more of the same in Pakistan.

The first thing that struck me, as a filmmaker, about this extraordinary film is the way the opening sequence was shot – in fragments – by simply pointing the camera out of a vehicle traveling down the street with a fast shutter speed of maybe 250/second, which gives you a stuttering sequence of still frames strung together. It’s a technique popularized by Hollywood films like Saving Private Ryan and Traffic, and it works extremely well here to show that we’re entering a chaotic world.

There’s a shot early on in the film that I won’t forget for a long time: a sketchy street seen through a fish tank in which a pair of breathtakingly orange goldfish are floating. The contrast is unbelievable. It’s just an incredible shot that, if you got it, it has to go in the film. Reminded me that no matter where you are, keep your eyes open for things that don’t to fit within the paradigm of  everything else you’re keying on.

The most significant filmmaker take-away from this film is that it’s possible to include interviews in your film without including interviews. I’ll explain. In the first two-thirds of the film, at no point does the voice of the person being interviewed match with an interview happening on screen. Yet, we’re often seeing the person who is talking – only in different (but frequently related) situations. For example, the first person we get to know in the film is a young boy, who works for an abusive boss at a small car and motorbike repair shop. We hear the boy’s voice for a long time before we actually meet the boy, and when we meet him, it’s not in an interview context. He’s essentially giving us a voice-driven commentary about how awful his boss is, while at the same time we’re actually seeing how awful his boss is.

This is an extremely effective way to include interviews without forcing the audience to sit through predictable visuals. They are actually seeing what happens next at the same time as hearing what they need to hear to flesh out the story details. It’s brilliant. It’s a seamless combination of cinema verite with traditional documentary storytelling, and in this film at least, it’s effect is spellbinding. It doesn’t hurt that the kid is mostly silent through these ordeals, so there’s room for us to hear him explaining things. But the technique also works pretty well in part 2 of the film, when Longly manages to get himself embedded with Muqtada al Sadr’s militia during a tense period when most US journalists were getting embedded with US troops.

Random filmmaker observations:

I really liked the time-speeded sequence of the train leaving southern Iraq and then we lurch into fast motion, the perspective switches from looking backward to looking forward, and we zip across the country in a few seconds into northern Iraq, where Longly hooks up with a Kurdish family. I just found a speed manipulation tutorial on Ken Stone’s Final Cut site that explains in detail, complete with project files, how to do this effect in Final Cut Pro 7.

Longly used a Panasonic DVX 100 while making this film, the standard-definition precursor to the Panasonic HVX 200 (which we used to shoot virtually all of Shine). The highlights are frequently blown out, and it lacks HD clarity, and there’s a lot of mic handling noise during some of the militia scenes. But none of that matters a bit, because the story is so damn compelling. The film is a solid reminder that the story and the person behind the camera is always more important than the equipment.

I found myself wondering if Longly used a Glidecam or something like a Steadicam Merlin for some of his traveling shots. They weren’t rock steady, but they were smoother than I could have hand held.

There are a lot of very briefly held, beautiful, almost still shots edited in liberally throughout the film. It reminded me that you don’t have to always be thinking in terms of sequence – just shoot something pretty even if it’s a couple seconds – you can find a place for it in editing. Also, he uses whip pans really effectively  as a transition at once point, panning quickly away from a child’s face and holding the blurry transition until dropping in the next clip. Whip-panning off someone’s face is a dramatic and powerful way to initiate a transition, and you don’t have to come to a sudden and precise stop on something else within the camera for it to be extremely useable in editing.

I really liked the brief time-disolve of the school teacher herding students down the hall. It’s a great way to convey time passing slowly for the child throughout the school day. And you don’t have to do a lot of these to call attention to them – I thought this was truly judicious use of these techniques which can otherwise call a lot of attention to their use.

Longly doesn’t hide the fact that the huge pillar of black, boiling smoke rising in the background of many of the scenes in the final third of the film is actually coming from a foundry, rather than from the result of war violence. But it works as a great metaphor. So does the snowball fight that he films, again with fast shutter speed.

Even the credit roll of this film is worth mentioning. Credits rolled out from right to left – rather than the traditional bottom to top – which is the same way people in the Arab world read. James Longly’s name entered the screen like an arrow, dragging all of the key roles behind him, carving a solitary path through the black screen and pulling the rest of the crew, which contain a raft of translators behind him. How the hell do you make a film like this with everything filtered through translaters?

I about fell over when I saw Basil Shadid’s name come up in the credits as the post-production supervisor on this film. I know Basil from having hired him to film the second BizJam conference we did a few years ago. More recently, he earned an additional camera credit on Shine for filming interviews at the May 6 event. Nice work Basil! I’m proud to know someone who played a role in making this incredible film.

Eye-Fi SD cards: almost live documentary filmmaking?

Check this out. Some clever engineers at a company called Eye-Fi have apparently figured out how to cram wi-fi capabilities into a class 6 SD card, and are claiming that this allows you to automatically download photos and video as you capture it. They call it “Endless Memory” mode. But what snaps me to attention about this isn’t the fact that I might no longer need to carry a fistful of SD cards on shoots. What’s really interesting is the possibility that one person with a video camera and an iPhone could theoretically broadcast in an almost live mode. That is, using these, it should be possible to download video as you shoot it to your iPhone, and have your iPhone configured to then automatically post video to your blog or social media.

Obviously most people wouldn’t want to dump everything as they shoot it straight to their Facebook profile. Everybody needs an editor. But if you were filming, say, in a sensitive situation where there was a chance of having your “film” confiscated, this could give you a lot of peace of mind. Like if you were James Longly filming last year’s election in Iran, for example (provided he were using a camera like my JVC HM100, which uses class 6 SD cards). How cool would it be to just shoot shoot shoot while posting your files to your hard drive back home?

The Burden of Dreams | documentary 2 of 10

Last night I screened The Burden of Dreams at my place, joined by Seattle documentary filmmaker Nassim Assefi and Seattle Film Institute cinematography instructor Steven Bradford and a few other friends. The 1982 documentary by Les Blank is a cutting portrayal of legendary filmmaker Warner Herzog during his 5-year quest to make Fitzcaraldo. I’m not keen on “making of” movies, but this one is far more about Herzog as a character than his film.

A psychotherapist once told me that to understand the behavior of people, including ourselves, it can be useful to think of them as actors starring in their own movies. The problem is, people don’t know when to stop acting. They get attached to the roles they define for themselves. Even when the results don’t make any sense or are harmful to themselves and others, they just keep playing out their parts, long after any adult in charge would have yelled “Cut!”

This film is a journey into Herzog’s vision of himself as a hero in his own movie, literally, with no one to tell him no. Except his film’s investors, who waste no time in doing so when it becomes clear Herzog is making what my psychotherapist pal might have called “poor choices.”

Everything continues to go wrong for Herzog, in large part because he insists on putting the cast and crew into extreme conditions of isolation and physical stress, in the name of extracting more authentic performances out of them. But it’s more than that. It’s as if Herzog WANTS to spend 5 years in the jungle. “I don’t want to live in a world where there are no lions, where there are not people like lions,” he says in one interview. In the jungle Herzog sees “overwhelming misery and fornication and lack of order. Even the stars look like a mess” here, he says, in his frighteningly ordered German accept.

I got so distracted by my repulsion for Herzog that I forgot to pay close attention to how the documentary was made. Nevertheless, I managed to come away with one useful observation, made by Steven. He reminded us that this film was made during a period when filmmakers, for the first time in history, came into the possession of film cameras that could also record sync sound while at the same time being small enough to shoulder-hold. That represented a technological breakthrough, just as momentous as the one many of us are buzzing about today with the arrival of HDSLRs like the Canon 5d. Directors like Herzog felt suddenly freed of the constraints of big studios. They were breaking free. Or at least, they were trying.

After the film, Steven showed us this 3:58 clip on YouTube, as an example of just how effective the studios have been in keeping directors out of the jungle and safely delivering earth-shaking apocalypse, on time and on budget. Check it out. Almost made me nostalgic for the sound of Herzog’s real steam ship crunching into real rocks. Almost.

Shine is officially complete, and submitted to SIFF today

Lara and Andrew get first look at completed Shine

Today’s the late deadline for SIFF, a deadline I’ve been aiming to hit for months. Sure enough, I did it with about 15 hours to spare. I hit the submit button sending Shine on it’s way via withoutabox.com at about 9am this morning, after a successful all-night render of the final file (it took more than 12 hours to render on my 2.5gz Macbook Pro – a sign that I need to start looking at a Mac desktop that has more editing horsepower).

The final film is exactly 24 minutes long. It took 8 months from beginning to end (although it’s not fully over yet, since we still have to produce a DVD with extras and such). I spent most of the day yesterday fussing with title slates, credit roll tweaks, and audio transitions. After I made the SIFF deadline this morning, I went down to the Biznik office and gave Lara and Andrew the first private screening of the final film. They liked it!

It feels great to have it complete. I’m sending a big thank you to everyone involved, especially the more than 100 volunteers and financial contributors who made the film possible. You guys rock.

What is Indie? | Documentary 1 of 100

On January 1st, I kicked off  my 100 films in 100 days personal challenge by screening a film loaned to me by Jeff Leisawitz, my friend who is also the Seattle musician who scored Shine. The film, titled What is Indie? is by first-time filmmaker Dave Cool, who hails from Canada (where I grew up).

What I immediately liked about this film was the intentions of the filmmaker. Here’s a guy who set out to explore a topic by making a film, funded by credit cards, no less. And the result is a totally credible contribution to our understanding of what it means to be an indie musician. Along the way we get to hear a lot of good music, meet a ton of musicians, and learn a bit about Cool, who narrates the film. I’m not sure that personal narration was the right way to go for this film. But it gets the job done.

The film succeeds in deepening our understanding of what it means to be an indie musician – if you are an indie musician or someone already interested in the topic. Cool lists Morgan Spurlock (Super Size Me) as one of his major influences, and I could really see that in the film’s narrative approach. Except for one thing: this film doesn’t manage to launch nearly as compelling a story train from the beginning, the way Super Size me did. If it had, I think this film could have appealed to a wider audience and made it easier to stick around to find out what happens while sitting through all of the many interviews. But if you’re into the topic, you’ll definitely stay with the film and enjoy it.

This film is spectacularly successful in one crucial way: it got made. It took Cool a year to make this film, and the fact that he did it is hugely inspiring to a beginning filmmaker like me. Making any film worth watching is a huge undertaking (it took us 8 months to complete Shine), and if more would-be filmmakers stopped thinking about the obstacles and just started doing it, we’d have a better understanding our our world.

This film’s run time is just under an hour. I’m guessing that made it hard to program at festivals, since all the advice I’ve received from people like SIFF programming manager Beth Barrett is that 30 minutes is the absolutely maximum for short docs. Otherwise, she said, if it’s in the 30-60 minute zone, it must be a truly extraordinary film in order to get selected for festival screening, because it will have to compete with feature length films (generally at least 80 minutes). Our first cut of Shine was 47 minutes, and it felt like the “right” length for the film. It was painful editing it down to 24 minutes. But I’m glad we did, and I ultimately I think it’s stronger because of it.

Key filmmaker takeaway: On the DVD, Cool added a lot of worthwhile extras, and the one labeled “Advice” really caught my attention. This section features people like CD Baby founder Derek Sivers giving advice to aspiring musicians about how to navigate the business side on their way to becoming a successful indie artist. I’ve got a TON of similar footage that we were not able to use in the final 24-minute edit of Shine, so I’m going to borrow this idea and create an Advice category when we make our DVD for Shine, where I’ll put the best of that stuff. Thanks for the idea, Dave, it’s a brilliant way to share helpful footage that would otherwise never see the light of day.

I discovered two noteworthy websites while writing this post, where you can purchase this film for immediate download or buy the DVD. Here’s links to purchase this film on bside.com (DVD $12.99; low-rez download $2.99; high-rez download $7.99 ) and also on filmbaby.com (DVD $14.00; download $9.99). On first glance, it looks like these sites are hints of a bright future in which documentary filmmakers can self-distribute their work directly to their audience. I’ll likely be looking for an online distributor for Shine after it’s festival debut later this year, so will take a closer look at these and post a more thorough review. Meanwhile, if you know of any compelling options for online and/or DVD self-distribution, please share them in the comments.

Strongman screening in Seattle, plus two workshops with director Zachary Levy

Northwest Film Forum is bringing director Zachary Levy to Seattle to screen his documentary film Strongman. It plays from Jan. 8 – 14 at the Forum, and the director will be in attendance on opening Friday and Saturday. I’ll be attending the Friday 7pm screening.

But here’s what’s really cool: Zachary Levy is teaching a pair of documentary workshops while he’s in town, one of them about my favorite style of documentary, cinema verite. I’ve signed up for both of them. Here’s the descriptions:

Strengthen your documentary filming techniques with visiting filmmaker Zachary Levy (Strongman). Each day, Zach will show clips demonstrating different documentary styles, and then lead a hands-on workshop. With Zach’s direction, students will arrange lighting set-ups and practice camera techniques. Saturday will be spent simulating verite style shooting, while Sunday is entirely focused on interview-based portraiture set-ups. Students are encouraged to bring clips from their own work as a starting point for solving the kinds of challenges they might face in the field.

Documentary Camera—Verite

Saturday, Jan 9, 12–3pm
Tuition: $35/WigglyWorld member, $40/general
Max Attendance: 12
Register

Documentary Camera—The Interview

Sunday, Jan 10, 12–3pm
Tuition: $35/WigglyWorld member, $40/general
Max Attendance: 12
Register

Lara's 40: a very short film by Dan McComb

We threw an amazing birthday party here on the 30th. And to commemorate, I made my last short film of the decade. For my extraordinary wife, Lara. Enjoy.

Technical notes: Shot on JVC HM-100 (most at  +9db medium gain). I used a small obie light that did a great job filling the eyes on the roving handheld camera shots. Color correction: Red Giant Software’s Magic Bullet Quick Looks (I applied a warm spot focus). Music: “Birthday” by Bird & Bee from the CD Ray Guns Are Not Just The Future. Stabilizer: Glidetrack SD 1-meter (I’ll be posting a full review of the Glidetrack soon).