For my documentary film work, I’ve been pretty satisfied with my Tram TR50s over the past few years. But when the mic capsule came loose for the second time on one of them, I was in the mood to try something new. After reading some reviews, I picked the DPA D:screet 4061 lav mic.
Why I chose DPA
- It’s modular, using micro-dot connector adapters that allow the mic to work with virtually any professional audio device (i.e., XLR, Sennheiser, Lectrosonics, etc).
- DPA makes a whole line of well designed accessories designed to make it easy to hide the mic.
- It sounds great under clothing using the included capsule for boosting high frequencies. It also comes with a capsule that boosts the mid frequencies for use when outside of clothing.
- The built quality is excellent, and it’s designed to withstand hours of sweaty performance.
The biggest surprise with the 4061 is how great it sounds under clothing when hidden. And how easy it is to hide using the DMM0012 Miniature Concealer. DPA makes some special two-sided round tape (ADH0002 Double-Sided Tape for Miniature Concealer), which is amazing stuff. You place the mic in the concealer, apply a piece of tape, then stick the mic anywhere inside your subject’s clothing, or on their chest directly. Using this setup, the mic us MUCH quieter under clothing than my TR50s ever were. I’m not sure why, exactly, but I can tell you that it just works. Something about the capsule of the TR50 makes it especially sensitive to clothing rustle.
One note: The DPA Microphones DPADH0004 double-sided tape costs $14 for 10 strips. When it arrived, I discovered it’s actually just Top-stick 1″x3″ toupe tape repackaged by DPA. You can buy 100 strips for the same price on Amazon.
DPA has made a video with some tips on how to hide their mics (or any others, really) under clothing:
I’ve taken the time to decipher some of the materials described in this video.
- Molton cloth – it’s the European name for what we call Duvetyne here in the US.
- Double-sided tape – the brand he’s using in the video is called Ve-ge Double-sided transparent carpet tape and 2″ x 82′ roll costs $12 on Amazon.
DPA lav vs Rode lav
I’ve also had a Rode lav for a few years, and it’s another decent sounding mic for dialog that uses micro-dot connectors. However, Rode’s implementation of the connectors is much less robust than those found on the DPA mics. The DPA mic has a locking connector, which is thicker, while the Rode connectors do not lock, and feel pretty flimsy. But they have held solid so far.
The Rode lav is also easy to hide under clothing using their Invisilav silicon mic concealers. But in my experience the double-sided tape on these tends to come off very easily, and is very fiddly to apply. The double-sided taping system that DPA makes for their concealer is definitely superior.
Quality has a price
If you’re looking to save money, the 4061 probably won’t be your first choice. The 4061 with microdot termination is $449. You’ll need to add at least one connector, and locking connector for Sennheiser Evolution wireless systems is $100; for an XLR connector it’s $115. The accessory kit padded case, pictured above, adds another $134 and includes a magnetic connector. The mic alone comes in a smaller clear, hard-plastic case. The concealer and it’s yellow double-sided tape stickers is sold separately.
The good news is that high-quality sound equipment evolves slowly (unlike cameras, which get upgrades every few months, it seems). It’s very likely that this mic will still be on the job 10 years from now. If you look at it that way, it’s a bargain!
Greetings! This is my 1st comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout
out and say I genuinely enjoy reading through your articles.
Can you recommend any other blogs/websites/forums that cover the
same topics? Appreciate it! Elite Tech Services LLC
3625 36th Ave,
Seattle, WA 98144
The best blog that i follow on fiend recording topics is by Paul Virostek: http://www.creativefieldrecording.com
I’ve been on the fence about going with the 4060/6060 vs 4061/6061. My biggest thing is I want to hid my lavaliers under clothing and minimize clothing rustle, but I don’t want my signal to be too low or muddy due to the lower sensitivity of the –61 models. Did you go with the 4061 over the 4060 for the same reason? Have you found that the lower sensitivity of the 4061 was a bad thing? Thank you in advance.
I haven’t noticed any issues that I can’t easily fix with a little EQ work in post. And lower sensitivity hasn’t been something I’ve noticed is an issue. The main thing I truly love about the DPA mics is that for some reason, the super thin mic cable is QUIET. It doesn’t transmit rustling like, for example, the Sennheiser AVX’s very thick mic cable does.