I recently took the plunge into DSLR cinematography by purchasing an $800 Canon T2i. If you scoff at the idea that video shot on a consumer grade Rebel can be taken serious by pros, I look forward to showing you some of the video I’ve been shooting. I’ll post a proper review of how this unpretentious game-changer is working for me in my documentary work soon. But today I want to talk about lenses.
Both Lara and I used to be professional photographers, and during those years, we acquired a fair bit of top-notch Nikon glass. So when I was looking for a HD video DSLR, I looked in vain at Nikon – Canon is so far ahead of every other DSLR manufacturer in this regard that it’s not worth discussing. I’d long heard about adapters that allow you to use Nikon lenses on Canon bodies, but I’d always dismissed them mainly because they don’t work with autofocus or other electronics, which is a big deal on modern still cameras.
But video is another matter entirely. Manual focus is the only way to go with video. Furthermore, one of the limitations of the T2i interface is that, if you’re using modern Canon lenses, you have to hold down a button on the back with your right thumb AND AT THE SAME TIME rotate a dial with your right index finger to change the aperture. That’s lame. Wouldn’t it be nice to just rotate the aperture ring instead? Using a lens adapter, you can.
Looking at lens adapters can be confusing: They range in price from a $270 model from Novoflex, to a $79 model from Fotodiox, to a $9.99 model sold by a top-rated Hong Kong ebay member Kawaphoto. I’ve since purchased and used 4 of them, and here’s what I’ve discovered.
I began by ordering the cheapest one from Hong Kong, and it arrived in less than a week via mail. With a little guesswork in how to correctly attach the thing (it comes with no instructions), I figured out how to rotate and lock it into place. Then I gingerly seated it on the Canon, worried that the protruding elements of the old Nikon lenses would hit the mirror or other electronics on the Canon. In fact, I had to remove a protruding element on my Nikon 35mm 1.4 lens in order for it to fit. But once that was done, it clicked into place and was good to go. The video produced was sharp and the lenses focused normally, no problem focusing to infinity (but it does allow you to go beyond infinity, which is slightly annoying if you routinely focus by looking at the focus ring instead of through the viewfinder).
I was so impressed with the fact that I could now use my Nikon glass on the T2i that I initially overlooked the fact that there was a little bit of play between the lens and the camera body. I ordered two more of the same inexpensive adapters, thanking, screw the expensive ones, these are great! But I got a wakeup call when the next batch arrived. One of them seemed to be fine, but one of them was a loose fit, which allowed the lens to rock back and forth when I turned the aperture dial, throwing the image slightly out of focus and jogging the image. At that point, it was clear to me that the cheap adapters, while they work, are not machined to exacting specifications. While not a big deal for only occasional use, I found this highly annoying with heavy use.
So I shelled out for the next cheapest model, sold by Fotodiox on Amazon for $79. It arrived quickly and much to my surprise, I discovered that it was made from plastic on one side, metal on the other. That worried me at first until I rotated it onto my lens and it snapped into place requiring a reassuring amount of force. The fit was like night and day from the all-metal cheaper version. Obviously made to much higher specifications, it holds the lens without any give at all. I can now twist the iris and focus without any fear of slippage.
Because all adapters are a bit of a pain to take on and off of your lenses, it’s a good idea to purchase one for every lens you are planning to use, and simply leave it on all the time. This means buying Canon lens caps for all your Nikon glass (in this business it seems every time you buy something, it means you have to buy yet another thing to support it, followed by yet another thing to carry it in, etc.)
I have not tried the more expensive version from Novoflex, because the $79 Fotodiox model works perfectly for me, and is the one I recommend if you’re shooting video professionally. If you’re only occasionally using Nikon glass on your Canon, buy three of the $9.99 adapters, try them all out when they arrive, and throw away the two that fit the least well.
Popularity: 28% [?]

Subscribe
Hey! I have a Canon T1i and I was thinking of getting a Nikon macro lens. I don’t know about you, but I feel like Nikon cameras produce crisper images than Canons. Do you think getting a Nikon lens for my Rebel would give me the same image quality as compared to shooting with a Nikon camera? Thanks, have a wonderful day (:
Hi Reiko, it’s really a subjective thing. Both Canon and Nikon glass can produce professional results. The main reason I prefer Nikon glass is because I like the manual aperture ring and big focus ring on Nikon lenses. All newer Canon lenses lack an aperture ring and often have manual focus that feels like an afterthought. Beyond that, if you want a real experts opinion on the difference between Canon and Nikon, read this: http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/nikon-vs-canon.htm
Hi Dan! what a great find, I found your blog talking about putting nikon lenses onto a T2i. What Nikon lenses should I be looking for that produce a good image? I noticed the Canon FD lenses don’t work so well, and they have a 2/3 of a stop loss when you mount them on an EOS body. I was going to do some ebay buying of nikor lenses. Since, I heard they work better with EOS cameras. ( the older stuff) I appreciate your help!
Hi Matt,
Here’s the Nikon prime lenses I currently own:
20mm f/4
35mm f/1.4
50mm f/1.4.
300mm f/4 and 1.4x Nikon teleconverter
All of my Nikon primes, with the exception of the 300mm, have 52mm lens filter size. This is really handy, because it allows me to use the same expensive variable neutral density filter interchangeably. The 20mm f/4 prime isn’t a fast lens, but it is a small lens that is quite sharp. I use it primarily as my Steadicam Merlin lens, because I like the light weight and fact that it doesn’t open more than f/4 is fine because I always shoot around f/4 – f/5.6 because I need the depth of field with the Merlin (there’s no way to focus during a take).
The 35mm 1.4 is a great lens, heavy piece of glass that is actually radioactive. Really. Nikon made these during the 70s for a very short period of time. It turns out that as they age, they develop a warm cast to the glass from the radioactivity (which is low-level enough to be harmless unless you put your eye next to it all the time). This isn’t a bad thing here in Seattle, where it’s cloudy all the time. The 50mm 1.4 is one of my favorite portrait lenses, and has beautiful bokeh. The 300mm f/4 lens is fantastic, but if I were going to buy this one again, I think I’d look for an image stabilized Canon lens – you have to be VERY careful shooting video with this lens because you’ll see every mistake in panning; even people stepping on the ground nearby the tripod causes it to vibrate visibly and can ruin a shot. Image stabilization takes care of that.
My most recent lens purchase is the Canon 17-55mm 2.8 IS lens, which I realized I needed because I like to hand hold a lot of shots, and my nikon primes really were not getting the job done in that department, possibly because I’m 45 and my hands aren’t as steady as they used to be. The image stabilization really helps with that. But for low light on a tripod on Tiny Saddle, I love my Nikon 35 and 50. One thing to note: I also have a Nikon 50 f 1.8. It is smaller and far less expensive than the Nikon 1.4, and almost as good, frankly. So if you’re looking to save money and get a 50, I would recommend the 1.8 over the 1.4.
One other Nikon lens I recommend: 75-150 f/3.5. It’s a manual focus zoom, and I picked one up at a local camera used lens shop for $65. The zoom range is consistent throughout, which is nice, it’s also a 52mm filter size (matching all the my others), and it’s tiny. This makes it wonderful to travel with, and it’s a very sharp little lens. Galen Rowell famously used this lens to take his popular photograph “Rainbow over the Potala Palace.”
Hi Dan, I just got my 1st nikon lens, a 50mm 1.4 My adaptor is the cheapy from Hong Kong. Seems to fit nicely. What’s the best recommended shooting method with video? I’m using the T2i. I have tried AV and Manual modes….
Thanks!
Hi David,
Great lens! For shooting video, your only option will be the video mode. AV and Manual are for stills. But the good news is that you can shoot with it in auto or manual in stills mode: just go to the menu, and under Movie Exposure, select either Manual or Auto. If you select Auto, your camera will automatically set the shutter speed in response to your changes of aperture. That isn’t such a great thing if you’re trying to shoot cinema style at 50th of a second, so I generally set everything to manual, set my shutter to 50th (at 24p) and then dial my aperture until I find the right exposure. Make sense?
Hi Dan,
i’ve got interested with your experienced mixed Canon and nikkon.
well, i am using Canon 60D and i’ve got interested with Nikkon 70200 VR II.
i would like ask you a few issue :
1. would those nikkon lens + canon body could work properly as well as their use in 1 brand?
2. is there any issue or an appropriate problem mixing their 2 together?
HI Andrew,
I wouldn’t purchase new Nikon G series glass for use on Canon. That’s because the G series doesn’t have a manual aperture control, like all other Nikon lenses do, and plus all the autofocus stuff you’d be paying a premium for won’t work on the Canon.
So if you’re going to buy new glass, get the Canon glass. But if you’re looking to buy used glass, get Nikon manual lenses.
Hi Dan
Its been quite interesting to see how the old Nikon lens being used on the Canon Body. I am intending to buy a Canon 5DMKII and a 7D for documentary and Inde movie making. I had initially planned for Carl Zeiss DSLR lens kit. However also planing for the spare camera some Nikon lenses. Well u said already manual focus but would u pl. suggest what series or type of Nikkon lenses should I be looking for in ebay? I am bit confused with different series and types avilable in the market. Having said that would you recommend carl zeiss dslr kit over old Nikon? Thanks and appreciate ur reply. Rgds Andy
Hi Andy,
If cost isn’t an issue, I would definitely recommend the Zeiss glass over Nikon, for two reasons: 1. it’s slightly better glass and 2. it’s available in EOS mount, so you won’t have to use adapters at all. The Zeiss CP.2 compact primes are the cream of the crop for narrative filmmaking, and I think they’d work fine for documentary work as well, although if that’s your primary focus, then the Zeiss ZE series will do nicely and less expensive.
Regarding Nikon, any of the older manual focus ones are outstanding, such as the AI series. Even the older ones, such as the Nikkor-N, work fantastically with EOS adapters if you simply remove the protruding lever with a philips head screwdriver. I have a Nikkor-N 35mm 1.4 that I use all the time with great results.
Hi Dan,
Thanks a lot for the advice on both Zeiss ZE and Nikon lens. Appreciate it.
By the by I had watched some of your Videos..they are awesome. All the best!
Andy
Hello Dan, i have been surfing the net day and night trying to find out if it’s possible to adapt a 24×70 nikon lens on a Canon body. I been reading a lot of getting prime fix lenses like the 50mm, 85mm, 14mm and so on but nothing about attaching Zoom Nikon lenses to canon bodies. Is it possible? what are the advantages and disadvantages if i do it so?
I m considering to switch to nikon gear in the future, i believe they produce sharper images than canon, but i don’t have the budget for that now. So i would rather start slowly buying nikon lenses until i get to the point where i can just buy a full frame nikon body…
Hope you can advice me on this,
Cheers!!
Eric A.
Hi Eric,
You can use both primes and zooms with adapters. There’s no difference whatsoever, as long as the lenses you’re using are manual (the G series Nikon’s being the exception). If you want to use G series lenses on your Canon, you can do it, but you’ll need a more expensive adapter like this one: http://www.dpreview.com/news/1007/10072602novoflexeosnikntadapter.asp
Hi Dan,
I’ve just bought the ‘amateur’ Fotodiox Nikon to EOS adapter, and while it works great with all my Nikon lenses, when I use it with my Nikon 20mm f/4 AI it locks up the aperture ring. I wondered if you ran into a similiar problen, and if so what you did to resolve it.
Best,
Elias
Hi Elias,
Very interesting. I don’t have any problem using my Fotodiox adapter with my Nikon 20mm f/4 lens. However, I have the opposite problem: if I try to put the 20 on a NIkon camera, it locks up the aperture ring. I have only tried this once, because I purchased the lens used for use with my Canons. My wife has a Nikon and one time she wanted to borrow the lens, which is how I discovered this issue. Go figure!
Hi Dan,
thank you so much for this, I was wondering if I can use my Nikon 70-200mm VRII & Nikon 24-70mm with 550D! I’m learning video these days and really want a good camera to deal with it!
couldn’t make it with my Nikon D90
do you recommend to use the adaptor or I should buy some Canon lenses?
Cheers,
Ahmad
Hey Dan,
Weird stuff indeed.
I’ve contacted Fotodiox on this issue, and they say that the little black plastic inset on the back of the lens is what’s causing it. They came up with 3 solutions: using force to rotate the ring (hoping that things will get smoother over time), using a little oil on the adapter itself, and finally taking the inset completely off.
Hope this helps someone, although personally I prefer trying a different adapter than risking damage to the lens / camera body.
Best,
Elias
Ah ha. I’ll take a closer look at the plastic inset on my lens if I need to use it on a Nikon again. Thanks Elias.
Hi Ahmad,
The 550D is a great camera for shooting video, definitely the way to go vs. Nikon D90. And yes, you can use all of your Nikon glass without any problem, as long as you have an adapter. Autofocus won’t work, of course, but that doesn’t matter for video, for which you’ll be using the lens in manual focus mode anyway. I prefer the manual focus Nikon glass for use on Canons, simply because they have bigger focusing rings. But there’s no reason you can’t use Nikon autofocus lenses with Canon.
Hey Dan this is Ayaan,
I’m a beginner photographer.. I own a canon EOS 1100D. Just want to know Can I use Nikon/Nikkor glasses to take some good shots or video footage? Are those lenses compatible with Canon OS 1100D?
Hi Ayaan,
Yes, you can use your camera with an EOS-Nikon adapter, such as the ones I’ve described in this post. Have fun with it.